2000 Jaguar F-Type vs. 2012 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2012 Volvo XC90 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Jaguar F-Type. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Jaguar F-Type would be higher. At 4,194 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Jaguar F-Type is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Jaguar F-Type (390 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 150 more horse power than 2012 Volvo XC90. (240 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Jaguar F-Type should accelerate faster than 2012 Volvo XC90. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 355 kg more than 2000 Jaguar F-Type.
Because 2012 Volvo XC90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Jaguar F-Type. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Jaguar F-Type | 2012 Volvo XC90 | |
| Make | Jaguar | Volvo |
| Model | F-Type | XC90 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4194 cc | 3200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 390 HP | 240 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 6200 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1800 kg | 2155 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4100 mm | 4808 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1897 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1100 mm | 1783 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2860 mm |
