2000 Jaguar F-Type vs. 2013 Cadillac SRX
To start off, 2013 Cadillac SRX is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Jaguar F-Type. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Jaguar F-Type would be higher. At 4,194 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Jaguar F-Type is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Jaguar F-Type (390 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 86 more horse power than 2013 Cadillac SRX. (304 HP @ 6800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Jaguar F-Type should accelerate faster than 2013 Cadillac SRX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac SRX weights approximately 680 kg more than 2000 Jaguar F-Type.
Because 2000 Jaguar F-Type is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Jaguar F-Type. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac SRX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Jaguar F-Type | 2013 Cadillac SRX | |
| Make | Jaguar | Cadillac |
| Model | F-Type | SRX |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4194 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 390 HP | 304 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 6800 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1800 kg | 2480 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4100 mm | 4834 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1910 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1100 mm | 1669 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2807 mm |
