2000 Jaguar F-Type vs. 2013 Dodge DURANGO
To start off, 2013 Dodge DURANGO is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Jaguar F-Type. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Jaguar F-Type would be higher. At 4,194 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Jaguar F-Type is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Jaguar F-Type (390 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 104 more horse power than 2013 Dodge DURANGO. (286 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Jaguar F-Type should accelerate faster than 2013 Dodge DURANGO. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Dodge DURANGO weights approximately 429 kg more than 2000 Jaguar F-Type.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Jaguar F-Type | 2013 Dodge DURANGO | |
| Make | Jaguar | Dodge |
| Model | F-Type | DURANGO |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4194 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 390 HP | 286 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 5-speed automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1800 kg | 2229 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4100 mm | 5075 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 2172 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1100 mm | 1801 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 3042 mm |
