2000 Jaguar F-Type vs. 2013 Dodge DURANGO
To start off, 2013 Dodge DURANGO is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Jaguar F-Type. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Jaguar F-Type would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Dodge DURANGO is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Jaguar F-Type (390 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 2013 Dodge DURANGO. (355 HP @ 5150 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Jaguar F-Type should accelerate faster than 2013 Dodge DURANGO. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Dodge DURANGO weights approximately 618 kg more than 2000 Jaguar F-Type.
Because 2013 Dodge DURANGO is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Jaguar F-Type. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Dodge DURANGO will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Jaguar F-Type | 2013 Dodge DURANGO | |
Make | Jaguar | Dodge |
Model | F-Type | DURANGO |
Year Released | 2000 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4194 cc | 5700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 390 HP | 355 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 5150 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1800 kg | 2418 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4100 mm | 5075 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 2172 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1100 mm | 1801 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 3042 mm |