2000 Jaguar F-Type vs. 2013 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2013 Ford Mustang is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Jaguar F-Type. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Jaguar F-Type would be higher. At 5,800 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Ford Mustang (653 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 263 more horse power than 2000 Jaguar F-Type. (390 HP @ 6100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2000 Jaguar F-Type. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Jaguar F-Type weights approximately 52 kg more than 2013 Ford Mustang.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Jaguar F-Type has automatic transmission and 2013 Ford Mustang has manual transmission. 2013 Ford Mustang will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Jaguar F-Type will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Jaguar F-Type | 2013 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Jaguar | Ford |
Model | F-Type | Mustang |
Year Released | 2000 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4194 cc | 5800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 390 HP | 653 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1800 kg | 1748 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4100 mm | 4778 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 2035 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1100 mm | 1438 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2720 mm |