2000 Jaguar XK vs. 1962 Renault 8
To start off, 2000 Jaguar XK is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Renault 8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Renault 8 would be higher. At 3,996 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Jaguar XK (290 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 243 more horse power than 1962 Renault 8. (47 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 1962 Renault 8. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Jaguar XK weights approximately 830 kg more than 1962 Renault 8. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Jaguar XK | 1962 Renault 8 | |
| Make | Jaguar | Renault |
| Model | XK | 8 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 3996 cc | 956 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 290 HP | 47 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1570 kg | 740 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1500 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2280 mm |
