2000 Jaguar XK vs. 1963 Triumph Dove GTR4
To start off, 2000 Jaguar XK is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph Dove GTR4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph Dove GTR4 would be higher. At 3,996 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Jaguar XK (290 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 186 more horse power than 1963 Triumph Dove GTR4. (104 HP @ 4750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 1963 Triumph Dove GTR4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Jaguar XK weights approximately 685 kg more than 1963 Triumph Dove GTR4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Jaguar XK | 1963 Triumph Dove GTR4 | |
Make | Jaguar | Triumph |
Model | XK | Dove GTR4 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3996 cc | 2138 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 290 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 4750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1700 kg | 1015 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 3970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2140 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 29 L |