2000 Jaguar XK vs. 1964 Renault 4
To start off, 2000 Jaguar XK is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Renault 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Renault 4 would be higher. At 3,996 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Jaguar XK (290 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 257 more horse power than 1964 Renault 4. (33 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 1964 Renault 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Jaguar XK weights approximately 1046 kg more than 1964 Renault 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Jaguar XK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Jaguar XK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 Renault 4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Jaguar XK | 1964 Renault 4 | |
Make | Jaguar | Renault |
Model | XK | 4 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3996 cc | 747 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 290 HP | 33 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1700 kg | 654 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 3670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 38 L |