2000 Jaguar XK vs. 1983 Plymouth Reliant
To start off, 2000 Jaguar XK is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Plymouth Reliant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Plymouth Reliant would be higher. At 3,996 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Jaguar XK weights approximately 550 kg more than 1983 Plymouth Reliant.
Because 2000 Jaguar XK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Jaguar XK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Plymouth Reliant, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Jaguar XK | 1983 Plymouth Reliant | |
| Make | Jaguar | Plymouth |
| Model | XK | Reliant |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3996 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 290 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1700 kg | 1150 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4550 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1740 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2260 mm |
