2000 Jaguar XK vs. 2009 Nissan Cube
To start off, 2009 Nissan Cube is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,996 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Jaguar XK (290 HP) has 170 more horse power than 2009 Nissan Cube. (120 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 2009 Nissan Cube.
Because 2000 Jaguar XK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Jaguar XK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Cube, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Jaguar XK (393 Nm) has 266 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Nissan Cube. (127 Nm). This means 2000 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Nissan Cube.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Jaguar XK | 2009 Nissan Cube | |
Make | Jaguar | Nissan |
Model | XK | Cube |
Year Released | 2000 | 2009 |
Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3996 cc | 1797 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 290 HP | 120 HP |
Torque | 393 Nm | 127 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4320 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1620 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2830 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 82 L |