2000 Jaguar XKA vs. 1963 Simca 1300
To start off, 2000 Jaguar XKA is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Simca 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Simca 1300 would be higher. At 4,399 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Jaguar XKA is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Jaguar XKA (466 HP) has 415 more horse power than 1963 Simca 1300. (51 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Jaguar XKA should accelerate faster than 1963 Simca 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Jaguar XKA weights approximately 810 kg more than 1963 Simca 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Jaguar XKA (843 Nm) has 741 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Simca 1300. (102 Nm). This means 2000 Jaguar XKA will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Simca 1300.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Jaguar XKA | 1963 Simca 1300 | |
| Make | Jaguar | Simca |
| Model | XKA | 1300 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 4399 cc | 1290 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 466 HP | 51 HP |
| Torque | 843 Nm | 102 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1800 kg | 990 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 2530 mm |
