2000 Jaguar XKA vs. 1966 Skoda 1202
To start off, 2000 Jaguar XKA is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Skoda 1202. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Skoda 1202 would be higher. At 4,399 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Jaguar XKA is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Jaguar XKA (466 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 422 more horse power than 1966 Skoda 1202. (44 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Jaguar XKA should accelerate faster than 1966 Skoda 1202. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Jaguar XKA weights approximately 695 kg more than 1966 Skoda 1202. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Jaguar XKA (843 Nm) has 759 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Skoda 1202. (84 Nm). This means 2000 Jaguar XKA will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Skoda 1202.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Jaguar XKA | 1966 Skoda 1202 | |
Make | Jaguar | Skoda |
Model | XKA | 1202 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4399 cc | 1172 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 466 HP | 44 HP |
Engine RPM | 6150 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 843 Nm | 84 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1800 kg | 1105 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 2690 mm |