2000 Jaguar XKA vs. 1973 Zastava 1300
To start off, 2000 Jaguar XKA is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Zastava 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Zastava 1300 would be higher. At 4,399 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Jaguar XKA is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Jaguar XKA (466 HP) has 413 more horse power than 1973 Zastava 1300. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Jaguar XKA should accelerate faster than 1973 Zastava 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Jaguar XKA weights approximately 816 kg more than 1973 Zastava 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Jaguar XKA (843 Nm) has 750 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Zastava 1300. (93 Nm). This means 2000 Jaguar XKA will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Zastava 1300.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Jaguar XKA | 1973 Zastava 1300 | |
| Make | Jaguar | Zastava |
| Model | XKA | 1300 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1973 |
| Engine Size | 4399 cc | 1295 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 466 HP | 53 HP |
| Torque | 843 Nm | 93 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1800 kg | 984 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 2430 mm |
