2000 Jaguar XKA vs. 1977 Mazda RX-3
To start off, 2000 Jaguar XKA is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Mazda RX-3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Mazda RX-3 would be higher. At 4,399 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Jaguar XKA is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Jaguar XKA (466 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 366 more horse power than 1977 Mazda RX-3. (100 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Jaguar XKA should accelerate faster than 1977 Mazda RX-3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Jaguar XKA weights approximately 948 kg more than 1977 Mazda RX-3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Jaguar XKA (843 Nm) has 708 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Mazda RX-3. (135 Nm). This means 2000 Jaguar XKA will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Mazda RX-3.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Jaguar XKA | 1977 Mazda RX-3 | |
Make | Jaguar | Mazda |
Model | XKA | RX-3 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1977 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4399 cc | 1964 cc |
Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 466 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 6150 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 843 Nm | 135 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1800 kg | 852 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 2320 mm |