2000 Jaguar XKA vs. 1995 Volvo 960
To start off, 2000 Jaguar XKA is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Volvo 960. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Volvo 960 would be higher. At 4,399 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Jaguar XKA is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Jaguar XKA (466 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 298 more horse power than 1995 Volvo 960. (168 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Jaguar XKA should accelerate faster than 1995 Volvo 960. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Jaguar XKA weights approximately 300 kg more than 1995 Volvo 960. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Jaguar XKA (843 Nm) has 610 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Volvo 960. (233 Nm). This means 2000 Jaguar XKA will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Volvo 960.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Jaguar XKA | 1995 Volvo 960 | |
Make | Jaguar | Volvo |
Model | XKA | 960 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4399 cc | 2473 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 466 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 6150 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 843 Nm | 233 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1800 kg | 1500 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 2780 mm |