2000 Jaguar XKA vs. 1996 Rover 200

To start off, 2000 Jaguar XKA is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Rover 200 would be higher. At 4,399 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Jaguar XKA is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Jaguar XKA (466 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 326 more horse power than 1996 Rover 200. (140 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Jaguar XKA should accelerate faster than 1996 Rover 200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Jaguar XKA weights approximately 595 kg more than 1996 Rover 200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2000 Jaguar XKA is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Jaguar XKA. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Rover 200, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Jaguar XKA (843 Nm) has 658 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Rover 200. (185 Nm). This means 2000 Jaguar XKA will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Rover 200.

Compare all specifications: