2000 Jaguar XKA vs. 2003 Westfield XTR 2
To start off, 2003 Westfield XTR 2 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Jaguar XKA. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Jaguar XKA would be higher. At 4,399 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Jaguar XKA is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Jaguar XKA (466 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 293 more horse power than 2003 Westfield XTR 2. (173 HP @ 9800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Jaguar XKA should accelerate faster than 2003 Westfield XTR 2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Jaguar XKA weights approximately 1360 kg more than 2003 Westfield XTR 2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Jaguar XKA | 2003 Westfield XTR 2 | |
Make | Jaguar | Westfield |
Model | XKA | XTR 2 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2003 |
Engine Size | 4399 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 466 HP | 173 HP |
Engine RPM | 6150 RPM | 9800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1800 kg | 440 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 2320 mm |