2000 Jaguar XKA vs. 2005 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2005 Ford Ecosport is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Jaguar XKA. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Jaguar XKA would be higher. At 4,399 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Jaguar XKA is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Jaguar XKA (466 HP) has 357 more horse power than 2005 Ford Ecosport. (109 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Jaguar XKA should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford Ecosport.
Because 2000 Jaguar XKA is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Jaguar XKA. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Jaguar XKA | 2005 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Jaguar | Ford |
Model | XKA | Ecosport |
Year Released | 2000 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4399 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 466 HP | 109 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 2490 mm |