2000 Jaguar XKA vs. 2005 Mercedes-Benz ML

To start off, 2005 Mercedes-Benz ML is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Jaguar XKA. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Jaguar XKA would be higher. At 4,399 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Jaguar XKA is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Jaguar XKA (466 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 235 more horse power than 2005 Mercedes-Benz ML. (231 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Jaguar XKA should accelerate faster than 2005 Mercedes-Benz ML. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mercedes-Benz ML weights approximately 320 kg more than 2000 Jaguar XKA.

Because 2005 Mercedes-Benz ML is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Jaguar XKA. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mercedes-Benz ML will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Jaguar XKA (843 Nm) has 513 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mercedes-Benz ML. (330 Nm). This means 2000 Jaguar XKA will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mercedes-Benz ML. 2005 Mercedes-Benz ML has automatic transmission and 2000 Jaguar XKA has manual transmission. 2000 Jaguar XKA will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Mercedes-Benz ML will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: