2000 Jaguar XKA vs. 2005 Spyker C8
To start off, 2005 Spyker C8 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Jaguar XKA. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Jaguar XKA would be higher. At 4,399 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Jaguar XKA is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Jaguar XKA weights approximately 650 kg more than 2005 Spyker C8.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Jaguar XKA | 2005 Spyker C8 | |
| Make | Jaguar | Spyker |
| Model | XKA | C8 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 4399 cc | 4172 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 466 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1800 kg | 1150 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 2560 mm |
