2000 Jaguar XKA vs. 2009 Kia Optima
To start off, 2009 Kia Optima is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Jaguar XKA. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Jaguar XKA would be higher. At 4,399 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Jaguar XKA is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Jaguar XKA (466 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 293 more horse power than 2009 Kia Optima. (173 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Jaguar XKA should accelerate faster than 2009 Kia Optima.
Because 2000 Jaguar XKA is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Jaguar XKA. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Kia Optima, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Jaguar XKA (843 Nm) has 674 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Kia Optima. (169 Nm). This means 2000 Jaguar XKA will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Kia Optima.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Jaguar XKA | 2009 Kia Optima | |
| Make | Jaguar | Kia |
| Model | XKA | Optima |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4399 cc | 2399 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 466 HP | 173 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6150 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 843 Nm | 169 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 2730 mm |
