2000 Jaguar XKA vs. 2012 Nissan Navara
To start off, 2012 Nissan Navara is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Jaguar XKA. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Jaguar XKA would be higher. At 4,399 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Jaguar XKA is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2012 Nissan Navara is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Jaguar XKA. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Nissan Navara will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2012 Nissan Navara has automatic transmission and 2000 Jaguar XKA has manual transmission. 2000 Jaguar XKA will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Nissan Navara will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Jaguar XKA | 2012 Nissan Navara | |
Make | Jaguar | Nissan |
Model | XKA | Navara |
Year Released | 2000 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4399 cc | 2993 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 466 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 3210 mm |