2000 Jaguar XKA vs. 2012 SsangYong Rexton
To start off, 2012 SsangYong Rexton is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Jaguar XKA. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Jaguar XKA would be higher. At 4,399 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Jaguar XKA is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Jaguar XKA (466 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 283 more horse power than 2012 SsangYong Rexton. (183 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Jaguar XKA should accelerate faster than 2012 SsangYong Rexton. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 SsangYong Rexton weights approximately 215 kg more than 2000 Jaguar XKA.
Because 2012 SsangYong Rexton is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Jaguar XKA. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 SsangYong Rexton will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Jaguar XKA (843 Nm) has 441 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 SsangYong Rexton. (402 Nm). This means 2000 Jaguar XKA will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 SsangYong Rexton.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Jaguar XKA | 2012 SsangYong Rexton | |
Make | Jaguar | SsangYong |
Model | XKA | Rexton |
Year Released | 2000 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4399 cc | 2696 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 466 HP | 183 HP |
Engine RPM | 6150 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 843 Nm | 402 Nm |
Top Speed | 299 km/hour | 176 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1800 kg | 2015 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 2830 mm |