2000 Jaguar XKA vs. 2013 Kia Forte

To start off, 2013 Kia Forte is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Jaguar XKA. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Jaguar XKA would be higher. At 4,399 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Jaguar XKA is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Jaguar XKA (466 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 312 more horse power than 2013 Kia Forte. (154 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Jaguar XKA should accelerate faster than 2013 Kia Forte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Jaguar XKA weights approximately 539 kg more than 2013 Kia Forte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2000 Jaguar XKA is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Jaguar XKA. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Kia Forte, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Jaguar XKA (843 Nm) has 648 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Kia Forte. (195 Nm). This means 2000 Jaguar XKA will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Kia Forte.

Compare all specifications: