2000 Jaguar XKA vs. 2013 Volvo XC60
To start off, 2013 Volvo XC60 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Jaguar XKA. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Jaguar XKA would be higher. At 4,399 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Jaguar XKA is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Jaguar XKA (466 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 145 more horse power than 2013 Volvo XC60. (321 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Jaguar XKA should accelerate faster than 2013 Volvo XC60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Volvo XC60 weights approximately 118 kg more than 2000 Jaguar XKA.
Because 2013 Volvo XC60 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Jaguar XKA. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Volvo XC60 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Jaguar XKA (843 Nm) has 363 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Volvo XC60. (480 Nm). This means 2000 Jaguar XKA will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Volvo XC60.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Jaguar XKA | 2013 Volvo XC60 | |
Make | Jaguar | Volvo |
Model | XKA | XC60 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4399 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 6 valves |
Horse Power | 466 HP | 321 HP |
Engine RPM | 6150 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 843 Nm | 480 Nm |
Top Speed | 299 km/hour | 210 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1800 kg | 1918 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 2774 mm |