2000 Jaguar XKR vs. 1951 Jeep CJ3A

To start off, 2000 Jaguar XKR is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Jeep CJ3A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Jeep CJ3A would be higher. At 3,982 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Jaguar XKR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Jaguar XKR (370 HP) has 311 more horse power than 1951 Jeep CJ3A. (59 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Jaguar XKR should accelerate faster than 1951 Jeep CJ3A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Jaguar XKR weights approximately 625 kg more than 1951 Jeep CJ3A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1951 Jeep CJ3A is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Jaguar XKR. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1951 Jeep CJ3A will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Jaguar XKR (541 Nm) has 396 more torque (in Nm) than 1951 Jeep CJ3A. (145 Nm). This means 2000 Jaguar XKR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1951 Jeep CJ3A. 2000 Jaguar XKR has automatic transmission and 1951 Jeep CJ3A has manual transmission. 1951 Jeep CJ3A will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Jaguar XKR will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: