2000 Jeep Cherokee vs. 1997 Nissan Cima
To start off, 2000 Jeep Cherokee is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Nissan Cima. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Nissan Cima would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1997 Nissan Cima is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Nissan Cima weights approximately 100 kg more than 2000 Jeep Cherokee.
Because 2000 Jeep Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1997 Nissan Cima. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Jeep Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Jeep Cherokee | 1997 Nissan Cima | |
| Make | Jeep | Nissan |
| Model | Cherokee | Cima |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1997 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2464 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 120 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1430 kg | 1530 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4260 mm | 4880 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1770 mm |
