2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 1972 Mazda RX-2
To start off, 2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 2,683 cc (5 cylinders), 2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee (161 HP @ 3700 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 1972 Mazda RX-2. (118 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1972 Mazda RX-2.
Because 2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1972 Mazda RX-2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee (400 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 243 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Mazda RX-2. (157 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Mazda RX-2.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 1972 Mazda RX-2 | |
| Make | Jeep | Mazda |
| Model | Grand Cherokee | RX-2 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1972 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2683 cc | 2292 cc |
| Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 161 HP | 118 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3700 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 400 Nm | 157 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4160 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1590 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2480 mm |
