2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 1980 Mazda 323
To start off, 2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mazda 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mazda 323 would be higher. At 3,956 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 959 kg more than 1980 Mazda 323.
Because 2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Mazda 323. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 1980 Mazda 323 | |
Make | Jeep | Mazda |
Model | Grand Cherokee | 323 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3956 cc | 1415 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 188 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1834 kg | 875 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4050 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2320 mm |