2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 1982 Volvo 360
To start off, 2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Volvo 360. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Volvo 360 would be higher. At 3,956 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee (188 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 87 more horse power than 1982 Volvo 360. (101 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1982 Volvo 360. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 734 kg more than 1982 Volvo 360. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee (295 Nm @ 3050 RPM) has 132 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Volvo 360. (163 Nm @ 3300 RPM). This means 2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Volvo 360.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 1982 Volvo 360 | |
| Make | Jeep | Volvo |
| Model | Grand Cherokee | 360 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3956 cc | 1986 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 188 HP | 101 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5700 RPM |
| Torque | 295 Nm | 163 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3050 RPM | 3300 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 98.6 mm | 88.9 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 86.6 mm | 80 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1834 kg | 1100 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4310 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1670 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2410 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 87 L | 58 L |
