2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 1995 Nissan Cima
To start off, 2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Nissan Cima. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Nissan Cima would be higher. At 2,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Nissan Cima is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 Nissan Cima. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 1995 Nissan Cima | |
Make | Jeep | Nissan |
Model | Grand Cherokee | Cima |
Year Released | 2000 | 1995 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2683 cc | 2998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 161 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1770 mm |