2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 1997 Mazda MPV
To start off, 2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Mazda MPV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Mazda MPV would be higher. At 2,954 cc (6 cylinders), 1997 Mazda MPV is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee (161 HP @ 3700 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1997 Mazda MPV. (146 HP @ 4700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1997 Mazda MPV.
Because 2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1997 Mazda MPV. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee (400 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 172 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Mazda MPV. (228 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Mazda MPV.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 1997 Mazda MPV | |
Make | Jeep | Mazda |
Model | Grand Cherokee | MPV |
Year Released | 2000 | 1997 |
Body Type | SUV | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2683 cc | 2954 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 161 HP | 146 HP |
Engine RPM | 3700 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Torque | 400 Nm | 228 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4680 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2850 mm |