2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 2004 Marcos TSO
To start off, 2004 Marcos TSO is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee would be higher. At 5,667 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Marcos TSO is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Marcos TSO. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 2004 Marcos TSO | |
| Make | Jeep | Marcos |
| Model | Grand Cherokee | TSO |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3956 cc | 5667 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 188 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1690 mm |
