2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 2005 Mazda B3000
To start off, 2005 Mazda B3000 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee would be higher. At 3,956 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee (188 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 2005 Mazda B3000. (154 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 2005 Mazda B3000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 351 kg more than 2005 Mazda B3000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee (295 Nm) has 55 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mazda B3000. (240 Nm). This means 2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mazda B3000.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 2005 Mazda B3000 | |
Make | Jeep | Mazda |
Model | Grand Cherokee | B3000 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2005 |
Body Type | SUV | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3956 cc | 2966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 188 HP | 154 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 295 Nm | 240 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 98.6 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.6 mm | 80 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1834 kg | 1483 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2840 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.8 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 87 L | 62 L |