2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 2013 Toyota Tundra

To start off, 2013 Toyota Tundra is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Toyota Tundra (376 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 215 more horse power than 2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (161 HP @ 3700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee.

Because 2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Toyota Tundra. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Toyota Tundra (544 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 144 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (400 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 2013 Toyota Tundra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee.

Compare all specifications:

2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee 2013 Toyota Tundra
Make Jeep Toyota
Model Grand Cherokee Tundra
Year Released 2000 2013
Body Type SUV Pickup
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2683 cc 5700 cc
Engine Cylinders 5 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 161 HP 376 HP
Engine RPM 3700 RPM 5600 RPM
Torque 400 Nm 544 Nm
Torque RPM 1800 RPM 3600 RPM
Fuel Type Diesel Gasoline
Drive Type 4WD Rear
Transmission Type Automatic 6-speed automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Length 4620 mm 5820 mm
Vehicle Width 1850 mm 2030 mm
Vehicle Height 1770 mm 1930 mm
Wheelbase Size 2700 mm 3700 mm