2000 Jeep Varsity vs. 1963 Mazda R 360
To start off, 2000 Jeep Varsity is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Mazda R 360. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Mazda R 360 would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Jeep Varsity is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Jeep Varsity weights approximately 1162 kg more than 1963 Mazda R 360.
Because 2000 Jeep Varsity is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Mazda R 360. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Jeep Varsity will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Jeep Varsity (346 Nm) has 323 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Mazda R 360. (23 Nm). This means 2000 Jeep Varsity will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Mazda R 360.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Jeep Varsity | 1963 Mazda R 360 | |
| Make | Jeep | Mazda |
| Model | Varsity | R 360 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1963 |
| Engine Size | 3500 cc | 356 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 16 HP |
| Torque | 346 Nm | 23 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1542 kg | 380 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4220 mm | 2990 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1300 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1300 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 1770 mm |
