2000 Jeep Varsity vs. 1972 ZAZ 966
To start off, 2000 Jeep Varsity is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 ZAZ 966. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 ZAZ 966 would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Jeep Varsity is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Jeep Varsity weights approximately 802 kg more than 1972 ZAZ 966.
Because 2000 Jeep Varsity is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1972 ZAZ 966. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Jeep Varsity will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Jeep Varsity (346 Nm) has 294 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 ZAZ 966. (52 Nm). This means 2000 Jeep Varsity will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 ZAZ 966. 2000 Jeep Varsity has automatic transmission and 1972 ZAZ 966 has manual transmission. 1972 ZAZ 966 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Jeep Varsity will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Jeep Varsity | 1972 ZAZ 966 | |
Make | Jeep | ZAZ |
Model | Varsity | 966 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 3500 cc | 885 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 27 HP |
Torque | 346 Nm | 52 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1542 kg | 740 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4220 mm | 3740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2170 mm |