2000 Jeep Varsity vs. 1988 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2000 Jeep Varsity is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Jeep Varsity is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Jeep Varsity weights approximately 50 kg more than 1988 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 2000 Jeep Varsity is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1988 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Jeep Varsity will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Jeep Varsity (346 Nm) has 116 more torque (in Nm) than 1988 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (230 Nm). This means 2000 Jeep Varsity will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1988 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Jeep Varsity | 1988 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
| Make | Jeep | Oldsmobile |
| Model | Varsity | Cutlass |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1988 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3500 cc | 2837 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 130 HP |
| Torque | 346 Nm | 230 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1542 kg | 1492 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4220 mm | 4890 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2740 mm |
