2000 Jeep Varsity vs. 1996 Nissan R 390 GT1
To start off, 2000 Jeep Varsity is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Nissan R 390 GT1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Nissan R 390 GT1 would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Jeep Varsity is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2000 Jeep Varsity is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Nissan R 390 GT1. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Jeep Varsity will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Nissan R 390 GT1 (637 Nm) has 291 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Jeep Varsity. (346 Nm). This means 1996 Nissan R 390 GT1 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Jeep Varsity. 2000 Jeep Varsity has automatic transmission and 1996 Nissan R 390 GT1 has manual transmission. 1996 Nissan R 390 GT1 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Jeep Varsity will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Jeep Varsity | 1996 Nissan R 390 GT1 | |
Make | Jeep | Nissan |
Model | Varsity | R 390 GT1 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 3500 cc | 3493 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 550 HP |
Torque | 346 Nm | 637 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4220 mm | 4730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1150 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2720 mm |