2000 Jeep Varsity vs. 2003 MG ZT
To start off, 2003 MG ZT is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Jeep Varsity. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Jeep Varsity would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Jeep Varsity is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Jeep Varsity weights approximately 57 kg more than 2003 MG ZT.
Because 2000 Jeep Varsity is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 MG ZT. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Jeep Varsity will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Jeep Varsity (346 Nm) has 131 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 MG ZT. (215 Nm). This means 2000 Jeep Varsity will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 MG ZT. 2000 Jeep Varsity has automatic transmission and 2003 MG ZT has manual transmission. 2003 MG ZT will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Jeep Varsity will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Jeep Varsity | 2003 MG ZT | |
Make | Jeep | MG |
Model | Varsity | ZT |
Year Released | 2000 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3500 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 158 HP |
Torque | 346 Nm | 215 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1542 kg | 1485 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4220 mm | 4760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2760 mm |