2000 Jeep Varsity vs. 2011 Mercedes-Benz SL
To start off, 2011 Mercedes-Benz SL is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Jeep Varsity. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Jeep Varsity would be higher. At 5,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Mercedes-Benz SL is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Mercedes-Benz SL weights approximately 372 kg more than 2000 Jeep Varsity.
Because 2000 Jeep Varsity is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Mercedes-Benz SL. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Jeep Varsity will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Mercedes-Benz SL (530 Nm) has 184 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Jeep Varsity. (346 Nm). This means 2011 Mercedes-Benz SL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Jeep Varsity.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Jeep Varsity | 2011 Mercedes-Benz SL | |
| Make | Jeep | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | Varsity | SL |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3500 cc | 5500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 382 HP |
| Torque | 346 Nm | 530 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1542 kg | 1914 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4220 mm | 4582 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1816 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1298 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2560 mm |
