2000 Jeep Wrangler vs. 1963 Lotus Seven
To start off, 2000 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lotus Seven. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lotus Seven would be higher. At 2,464 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Jeep Wrangler (123 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 85 more horse power than 1963 Lotus Seven. (38 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1963 Lotus Seven. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 965 kg more than 1963 Lotus Seven. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Lotus Seven. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Jeep Wrangler | 1963 Lotus Seven | |
Make | Jeep | Lotus |
Model | Wrangler | Seven |
Year Released | 2000 | 1963 |
Body Type | SUV | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2464 cc | 997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 38 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1395 kg | 430 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 3360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1100 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2240 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 29 L |