2000 Jeep Wrangler vs. 1964 Lotus Elan
To start off, 2000 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 2,464 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Jeep Wrangler (123 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 1964 Lotus Elan. (100 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1964 Lotus Elan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 805 kg more than 1964 Lotus Elan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Lotus Elan. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Jeep Wrangler (193 Nm @ 2900 RPM) has 55 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Lotus Elan. (138 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2000 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Lotus Elan.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Jeep Wrangler | 1964 Lotus Elan | |
Make | Jeep | Lotus |
Model | Wrangler | Elan |
Year Released | 2000 | 1964 |
Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2464 cc | 1498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 193 Nm | 138 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2900 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 98.3 mm | 81 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81 mm | 72.7 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1395 kg | 590 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 3700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1430 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1150 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2140 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 45 L |