2000 Jeep Wrangler vs. 1966 Plymouth Valiant
To start off, 2000 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Plymouth Valiant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Plymouth Valiant would be higher. At 2,789 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Plymouth Valiant is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Jeep Wrangler (123 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 1966 Plymouth Valiant. (100 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1966 Plymouth Valiant.
Because 2000 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Plymouth Valiant. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Jeep Wrangler | 1966 Plymouth Valiant | |
Make | Jeep | Plymouth |
Model | Wrangler | Valiant |
Year Released | 2000 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2464 cc | 2789 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2700 mm |