2000 Jeep Wrangler vs. 1976 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2000 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 2,464 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 370 kg more than 1976 Toyota Celica.
Because 2000 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1976 Toyota Celica. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1976 Toyota Celica has automatic transmission and 2000 Jeep Wrangler has manual transmission. 2000 Jeep Wrangler will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1976 Toyota Celica will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Jeep Wrangler | 1976 Toyota Celica | |
| Make | Jeep | Toyota |
| Model | Wrangler | Celica |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1976 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2464 cc | 1968 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1395 kg | 1025 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 4380 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1330 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2510 mm |
