2000 Jeep Wrangler vs. 1984 Opel Kadett
To start off, 2000 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Opel Kadett. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Opel Kadett would be higher. At 2,464 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Jeep Wrangler (123 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 1984 Opel Kadett. (53 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1984 Opel Kadett.
Because 2000 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1984 Opel Kadett. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Jeep Wrangler (193 Nm @ 2900 RPM) has 95 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Opel Kadett. (98 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2000 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Opel Kadett.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Jeep Wrangler | 1984 Opel Kadett | |
Make | Jeep | Opel |
Model | Wrangler | Kadett |
Year Released | 2000 | 1984 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2464 cc | 1596 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 193 Nm | 98 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2900 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 4240 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2530 mm |