2000 Jeep Wrangler vs. 1989 Mazda 323
To start off, 2000 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Mazda 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Mazda 323 would be higher. At 2,464 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Jeep Wrangler (123 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 1989 Mazda 323. (110 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1989 Mazda 323.
Because 2000 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1989 Mazda 323. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Jeep Wrangler (193 Nm @ 2900 RPM) has 67 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Mazda 323. (126 Nm @ 5500 RPM). This means 2000 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Mazda 323.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Jeep Wrangler | 1989 Mazda 323 | |
| Make | Jeep | Mazda |
| Model | Wrangler | 323 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1989 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2464 cc | 1498 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 110 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 193 Nm | 126 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2900 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 98.3 mm | 78 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 81 mm | 78.4 mm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 4270 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2510 mm |
