2000 Jeep Wrangler vs. 1996 Nissan R 390 GT1
To start off, 2000 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Nissan R 390 GT1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Nissan R 390 GT1 would be higher. At 3,493 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Nissan R 390 GT1 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Nissan R 390 GT1 (550 HP) has 427 more horse power than 2000 Jeep Wrangler. (123 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Nissan R 390 GT1 should accelerate faster than 2000 Jeep Wrangler.
Because 2000 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Nissan R 390 GT1. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Nissan R 390 GT1 (637 Nm) has 444 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Jeep Wrangler. (193 Nm). This means 1996 Nissan R 390 GT1 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Jeep Wrangler.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Jeep Wrangler | 1996 Nissan R 390 GT1 | |
Make | Jeep | Nissan |
Model | Wrangler | R 390 GT1 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1996 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2464 cc | 3493 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 550 HP |
Torque | 193 Nm | 637 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 4730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1150 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2720 mm |