2000 Jeep Wrangler vs. 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS
To start off, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Jeep Wrangler. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Jeep Wrangler would be higher. In terms of performance, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS (507 HP) has 384 more horse power than 2000 Jeep Wrangler. (123 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS should accelerate faster than 2000 Jeep Wrangler.
Because 2000 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS (630 Nm) has 437 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Jeep Wrangler. (193 Nm). This means 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Jeep Wrangler. 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS has automatic transmission and 2000 Jeep Wrangler has manual transmission. 2000 Jeep Wrangler will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Jeep Wrangler | 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS | |
Make | Jeep | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Wrangler | CLS |
Year Released | 2000 | 2006 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 507 HP |
Torque | 193 Nm | 630 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 80 L |