2000 Jeep Wrangler vs. 2011 Citroen C-Crosser
To start off, 2011 Citroen C-Crosser is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Jeep Wrangler. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Jeep Wrangler would be higher. At 2,464 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Citroen C-Crosser (154 HP) has 31 more horse power than 2000 Jeep Wrangler. (123 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Citroen C-Crosser should accelerate faster than 2000 Jeep Wrangler.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Citroen C-Crosser (380 Nm) has 187 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Jeep Wrangler. (193 Nm). This means 2011 Citroen C-Crosser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Jeep Wrangler.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Jeep Wrangler | 2011 Citroen C-Crosser | |
Make | Jeep | Citroen |
Model | Wrangler | C-Crosser |
Year Released | 2000 | 2011 |
Body Type | SUV | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2464 cc | 2179 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 154 HP |
Torque | 193 Nm | 380 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 98.3 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81 mm | 96 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |